<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thinking Big With Small Solar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://solarpanelspower.net/solar-power/thinking-big-with-small-solar/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://solarpanelspower.net/solar-power/thinking-big-with-small-solar</link>
	<description>Solar Panels Can Power Your Life!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:00:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solar Chris</title>
		<link>http://solarpanelspower.net/solar-power/thinking-big-with-small-solar/comment-page-1#comment-1683</link>
		<dc:creator>Solar Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 05:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solarpanelspower.net/?p=3652#comment-1683</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with you on this. I&#039;ve been writing and solar blog (http://solarchris.blogspot.com/) and I am also a big proponent of &quot;individual-scale&quot; solar over &quot;utility-scale&quot;. If you think about it, solar is a very efficient small scale energy technology. Hence, the plethora of solar calculators, solar watches, solar-powered emergency call boxes on the freeway, etc. And while there are economies of scale (purchasing power), the cost efficiencies of solar bottom out pretty quickly. If you think about it, with other energy technologies, like gas, coal, or nuclear, you have a big plant and cheap fuel. They get more efficient the more power they produce because they can spread the fixed cost of the plant over more KWHs of electricity produced - just shove more cheap fuel through to make more electricity. Solar, on the other hand, requires that you add more modules to produce more electricity. Hence, solar modules are really quasi-variable costs, rather than true fixed costs like power plants. If you were to graph this, you&#039;d see a pretty flat curve for solar, which means that you&#039;re not getting as big of an improvement when you move from small scale to big utility scale as with other energy technologies. Therefore, I believe that small scale solar really does compete well with utility scale solar, especially given all of the other costs and complications you cite in your post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with you on this. I&#8217;ve been writing and solar blog (<a href="http://solarchris.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://solarchris.blogspot.com/</a>) and I am also a big proponent of &#8220;individual-scale&#8221; solar over &#8220;utility-scale&#8221;. If you think about it, solar is a very efficient small scale energy technology. Hence, the plethora of solar calculators, solar watches, solar-powered emergency call boxes on the freeway, etc. And while there are economies of scale (purchasing power), the cost efficiencies of solar bottom out pretty quickly. If you think about it, with other energy technologies, like gas, coal, or nuclear, you have a big plant and cheap fuel. They get more efficient the more power they produce because they can spread the fixed cost of the plant over more KWHs of electricity produced &#8211; just shove more cheap fuel through to make more electricity. Solar, on the other hand, requires that you add more modules to produce more electricity. Hence, solar modules are really quasi-variable costs, rather than true fixed costs like power plants. If you were to graph this, you&#8217;d see a pretty flat curve for solar, which means that you&#8217;re not getting as big of an improvement when you move from small scale to big utility scale as with other energy technologies. Therefore, I believe that small scale solar really does compete well with utility scale solar, especially given all of the other costs and complications you cite in your post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Griffin</title>
		<link>http://solarpanelspower.net/solar-power/thinking-big-with-small-solar/comment-page-1#comment-1308</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solarpanelspower.net/?p=3652#comment-1308</guid>
		<description>What do I need for solar power to run 20 water tanks for horses that won&#039;t cost a arm and a leg .These tanks are in different places around our property and need to keep water from freezing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do I need for solar power to run 20 water tanks for horses that won&#8217;t cost a arm and a leg .These tanks are in different places around our property and need to keep water from freezing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/10 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 213/218 objects using memcached

Served from: solarpanelspower.net @ 2012-02-13 08:34:57 -->
