<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Solar Panels - Green Power &#187; solar world</title>
	<atom:link href="http://solarpanelspower.net/tag/solar-world/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://solarpanelspower.net</link>
	<description>Solar Panels Can Power Your Life!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:20:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Solar Power Plant in Los Angeles to Power 85,000 Homes</title>
		<link>http://solarpanelspower.net/solar-power/solar-power-plant-in-los-angeles-to-power-85000-homes</link>
		<comments>http://solarpanelspower.net/solar-power/solar-power-plant-in-los-angeles-to-power-85000-homes#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 10:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phovoltaic panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar los angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solarworld]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solarpanelspower.net/?p=6355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could smog in L.A. be a thing of the past?  Government officials and industry leaders certainly hope so.  In order to reach its renewable energy target of 35% by 2020 (35% of all electricity from renewable resources), Los Angeles is looking for ways to rely more heavily on solar power. A new solar power plant [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could smog in L.A. be a thing of the past?  Government officials and industry leaders certainly hope so.  In order to reach its renewable energy target of 35% by 2020 (35% of all electricity from renewable resources), Los Angeles is looking for ways to rely more heavily on solar power.</p>
<div id="attachment_6364" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://solarpanelspower.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Veterans.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-6364" title="Grandma Fong's Birthday" src="http://solarpanelspower.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Veterans-300x235.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="235" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Putting solar power to work in Los Angeles</p></div>
<p>A new solar power plant in Los Angeles will power 85,000 homes. The City&#8217;s <a href="http://www.ladwpnews.com/go/site/1475/" target="_blank">Department of Water and Power</a> (LADWP) is joining forces with SolarWorld &#8211; a <a href="http://solarpowerpanels.ws/solar-panels/solar-panel-and-solar-cell-manufacturers-in-the-usa" target="_blank">solar panel manufacturer</a> &#8211; to build a 11.6 megawatt (MW) utility scale solar power station that will divert 290,000 tons of CO2 over the next quarter century.</p>
<p>The partnership between the LADWP and SolarWorld will work as follows:  SolarWorld will supply the PV solar panels (more than 46,000 of them) and solar inverters for the Adelanto facility.  The district will construct and operate the station, selling the clean electricity generated by the solar panels to its customers in regions of Los Angeles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://solarpanelspower.net/solar-power/solar-power-plant-in-los-angeles-to-power-85000-homes/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar Tax Credits and Incentives Debated in Oregon</title>
		<link>http://solarpanelspower.net/solar-power/solar-tax-credits-debated</link>
		<comments>http://solarpanelspower.net/solar-power/solar-tax-credits-debated#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 14:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar tax incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state of oregon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solarpanelspower.net/?p=903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a resident and taxpayer of Oregon, I have always paid close attention to proposed tax legislation.  I am not shy to jump into the debate regarding new taxes, either.  Of course, because I am a solar power proponent, I was particularly interested in a recent show on Oregon Public Broadcasting (OPB) on which state [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 250px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3057/3033524024_6e71fd1482_m.jpg"><img style="border: 0pt none; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="Top of Mt. Hood, Oregon" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3057/3033524024_6e71fd1482_m.jpg" border="0" alt="Top of Mt. Hood, Oregon" hspace="5" width="240" height="160" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Mt. Hood, Oregon</p></div>
<p>As a resident and taxpayer of Oregon, I have always paid close attention to proposed tax legislation.  I am not shy to jump into the debate regarding new taxes, either.  Of course, because I am a solar power proponent, I was particularly interested in a recent show on <a href="http://www.opb.org/" target="_blank">Oregon Public Broadcasting</a> (OPB) on which state <strong>solar tax credits</strong> and incentives were debated.</p>
<p>As part of Congress&#8217;s <a href="http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1843941,00.html" target="_blank">$700 billion bailout</a>, federal solar tax credits were extended.  Subsequently, Oregon Governor T<a href="http://governor.oregon.gov/" target="_blank">ed Kulongoski</a> announced that he wanted to expand state renewable energy tax credits in order to help address global warming.  As with many political moves, Kulongoski&#8217;s statement ignited a newsworthy debate in Oregon regarding <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>solar tax credits</strong></span> and incentives.  The fundamental question at issue is whether consumers should be taxed to provide incentives to solar project developers.  Who should pay for renewable energy projects?</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 250px"><a href="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/127/399324197_73ea5bc59f_m.jpg"><img style="border: 0pt none; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="3.trois.drei.tre.????.três.drie.tria.üç.???.????" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/127/399324197_73ea5bc59f_m.jpg" border="0" alt="3.trois.drei.tre.????.três.drie.tria.üç.???.????" hspace="5" width="240" height="120" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Blue skies in Oregon</p></div>
<p><a href="http://www.cascadepolicy.org/" target="_blank">Cascade Policy Institute</a>, a right-leaning organization, claims that solar tax credits provide &#8220;winners&#8221; and &#8220;losers&#8221; and ultimately reward the wrong technologies.  Its energy expert, Todd Wynne asserts that, if people want to invest in renewable energy options, they can check the &#8220;green power&#8221; box on their utility bill (for example, <a href="http://www.pacificpower.net/Homepage/Homepage35750.html" target="_blank">Pacific Power</a> has a &#8220;<a href="http://www.pacificpower.net/Homepage/Homepage35754.html" target="_blank">Blue Sky</a>&#8221; program that costs an additional $1.95/month for most consumers).  Wynne says:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Citizens are showing that they don’t want to pay more for power, even though there’s these supposed environmental benefits for renewable power. They’re showing by action they don’t want it, however, the government mandates exactly what the people don’t want.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Also opposed to solar tax credits, but for different reasons, is <a href="http://taxfairnessoregon.org/" target="_blank">Tax Fairness Oregon</a>.  Its representative, Kris Alman, states that government <em>should</em> invest in renewable energy projects, but believes that <strong>solar tax credits</strong> unfairly benefit investors.  Alman observed:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;If we&#8217;re using our tax and ratepayer dollars, and they&#8217;re getting more into investor hands, as a sure-fire deal as something they&#8217;re going to win as an investment, yet what we&#8217;re supposed to say is &#8216;it&#8217;s okay.&#8217; That to me doesn&#8217;t make sense because in the end, we should be getting something more than a good green feeling out of this.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 250px"><a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2064/2869058539_f48f5c4b3e_m.jpg"><img style="border: 0pt none; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="Crater Lake National Park" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2064/2869058539_f48f5c4b3e_m.jpg" border="0" alt="Crater Lake National Park" hspace="5" width="240" height="160" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Crater Lake National Park, Oregon</p></div>
<p>She does agree with <a href="http://www.solarworld-usa.com/" target="_blank">Solar World</a> and other industry leaders&#8217; proposal to allow consumers to sell back excess electricity generated by solar panels to utility companies.  Currently, Oregon residents can get credit on their utility bills, but cannot sell extra energy back to utilities for a profit.  A pilot program was announced by Kulongoski, and makes perfect sense to me!</p>
<blockquote><p>“This pilot program will provide incentives to homeowners and businesses that conserve part of the solar energy they produce, by allowing them to put the energy they conserve back into the grid. I believe this program will significantly accelerate Oregon’s use of solar energy.”</p></blockquote>
<p>The only &#8220;hitch,&#8221; if you will, is that the entire United States grid system would have to be standardized to allow the sell-back of excess solar energy generated by homes and businesses.  Not only would that require federal legislation, but opposition from many utilities is expected to slow any potential new laws in this regard.</p>
<p>Still, its a new day &#8211; a New Year and a new Administration about to take office in Washington, D.C.  Many elected officials are hopeful that, both in Oregon and nationwide, standardized systems may soon be a reality which can provide just the incentives many may need to convert to solar energy.</p>
<p>What do you think about the solar tax credit debate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://solarpanelspower.net/solar-power/solar-tax-credits-debated/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/10 queries in 0.006 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 274/288 objects using memcached

Served from: solarpanelspower.net @ 2012-05-25 15:55:15 -->
